Charter: Urkunden (1058-1899) 1400 II
Signature: 1400 II
Add bookmark
Edit charter (old editor)
[c. 1400] Februar
Bruchstuck eines Notariatsinstrumentes über die Kirche zu St. Leonhard am Forst.Source Regest:
FUCHS, Göttweig I (=FRA II/51, Wien 1901) S. 804, Nr. 891
FUCHS, Göttweig I (=FRA II/51, Wien 1901) S. 804, Nr. 891
Current repository:
Stiftsarchiv Göttweig (http://www.stiftgoettweig.or.at)
Stiftsarchiv Göttweig (http://www.stiftgoettweig.or.at)
Hängesiegel abgefallen.
Material: Pergament

a ............................................. dixit non procedendum propter compromissum ad probandum pred .............................. possessionem prefate ecclesie Sancti Leon`hardi in Foresto de hac .......................... euna et honorabilis vir magister Mathias de Walsee in artibus magister .......................................... revocatum et tundictus magister procuracio||
nonb ........... dicta cum ......................................ad dicendum contra statuimus competentem, subsequetur comp .............................................. Paulum et Sigismundum excommunicacionis sententiam incidisse pro eo, quia pro ..................................... tamquam procuratores habentes ad hoc mandatum sufficiens ab ipso .......................... vero magister||
Mathias nomine predicto eosdem non admitti tum instan ....................................... [in]terim statuimus competere, in quo quidem termino comparaverunt ............................. emanatas legi fecit, sed easdem aut earum copias ad acta ................................... et coram nobis ainbobus an et cuius iurisdictio per alterum ex nobis ........................................ dconsensu||
procuratur dictarum partium pro tuo per nos data fuit hora ................................................ uti volebat per ipsum notarium actorum coram ipsis productis et presentatis ..................... et iniuste, quod prefatus dominus Andreas officialis tamquam executor apostolicus ................||
nulliter de facto vël saltem indebite et iniuste in nostre iurisdictionis ............................. ut tamen Stephanum, Sigismundum et Paulum ae homines supradictos ..................................||
huiusmodi iuri et racioni consonam aipso Stephano principali .................................. facta fides ipse eciam Stephanus Zukcher principalis posicionibus .......................................... in Rueprechczhouen et Sigismundum predictos ex causis supradictis .................................... eadem auctoritate aggravamuin hiis scriptis. Quocirca vobis ........................... premissa auctoritate apostolica supradicta ferimus in hiis scriptis districte .......................................... gravatum singulis diebus dominicis et festivis in ambonibus ecclesiarum ........................ aut nobialiud habuerat in mandatis. Et quia nonnulli ....................................... exequentes in principalibus processibus ac nostris latas incidisse ................................... aut huiusmodi nos legitime certificare curetis sub pena excommunicacionis antedicte ............................... februarii hora vesperorum vel quasi, pontificatus sanctissimi in Christo patris ac domini ....................................... Heinrico Saxenhausen presbyteris et clericis dicte Pataviensis diocesis testibus ...................................... ||
(SN.) Et ego Georgius Melkchaymer .................... omnibus aliis et singuli ..................................... manu propria scriptum ............................... regatus et requisis in fidem .............................................
nonb ........... dicta cum ......................................ad dicendum contra statuimus competentem, subsequetur comp .............................................. Paulum et Sigismundum excommunicacionis sententiam incidisse pro eo, quia pro ..................................... tamquam procuratores habentes ad hoc mandatum sufficiens ab ipso .......................... vero magister||
Mathias nomine predicto eosdem non admitti tum instan ....................................... [in]terim statuimus competere, in quo quidem termino comparaverunt ............................. emanatas legi fecit, sed easdem aut earum copias ad acta ................................... et coram nobis ainbobus an et cuius iurisdictio per alterum ex nobis ........................................ dconsensu||
procuratur dictarum partium pro tuo per nos data fuit hora ................................................ uti volebat per ipsum notarium actorum coram ipsis productis et presentatis ..................... et iniuste, quod prefatus dominus Andreas officialis tamquam executor apostolicus ................||
nulliter de facto vël saltem indebite et iniuste in nostre iurisdictionis ............................. ut tamen Stephanum, Sigismundum et Paulum ae homines supradictos ..................................||
huiusmodi iuri et racioni consonam aipso Stephano principali .................................. facta fides ipse eciam Stephanus Zukcher principalis posicionibus .......................................... in Rueprechczhouen et Sigismundum predictos ex causis supradictis .................................... eadem auctoritate aggravamuin hiis scriptis. Quocirca vobis ........................... premissa auctoritate apostolica supradicta ferimus in hiis scriptis districte .......................................... gravatum singulis diebus dominicis et festivis in ambonibus ecclesiarum ........................ aut nobialiud habuerat in mandatis. Et quia nonnulli ....................................... exequentes in principalibus processibus ac nostris latas incidisse ................................... aut huiusmodi nos legitime certificare curetis sub pena excommunicacionis antedicte ............................... februarii hora vesperorum vel quasi, pontificatus sanctissimi in Christo patris ac domini ....................................... Heinrico Saxenhausen presbyteris et clericis dicte Pataviensis diocesis testibus ...................................... ||
(SN.) Et ego Georgius Melkchaymer .................... omnibus aliis et singuli ..................................... manu propria scriptum ............................... regatus et requisis in fidem .............................................
Source Fulltext: FUCHS, Göttweig I (=FRA II/51, Wien 1901) S. 804-805
Original dating clause: Diese Urkunde war als Deckblatt in einen Codex eingebunden und ist durch einen rechten Höhenschnitt verstümmelt.
Language:
Notes:
a Lücke hier und weiterhin infolge der Verstümmelung der Urkunde.
b durch ein Loch zerstört.
Places
- Pfarrkirche zu St. Leonhard am Forst
Persons
- Andreas, Offizial und päpstlicher Exekutor
- Magister Mathias von Wallsee
Göttweig, Stiftsarchiv, Urkunden (1058-1899) 1400 II, in: Monasterium.net, URL <https://www.monasterium.net/mom/AT-StiAG/GoettweigOSB/1400_II/charter>, accessed 2025-04-10+02:00
You are copying a text frominto your own collection. Please be aware that reusing it might infringe intellectural property rights, so please check individual licences and cite the source of your information when you publish your data
The Charter already exists in the choosen Collection
Please wait copying Charter, dialog will close at success